As a warm-up to the forthcoming fiftieth
anniversary of the classic show, let's look at one of it's
most iconic elements – the credit sequence. Because let's face it,
we do judge books by their covers and we do
watch TV shows according to their title sequences. We just do...
At one point
during the early story ’The Edge of Destruction’ we’re taken to the beginning of the universe. There being no money
then to actually show this sort of thing on the screen, the Doctor
instead demonstrates it through the medium of overacting. Spotlit, he
gushes on about how little particles are slowly drawn to other little
particles until finally things break out into recognisable shapes.
Watching the early
Hartnell era is a bit like that really. While the fans construct
elaborate timelines between stories and convoluted explanations for
apparent incongruities, never was a thing more clearly stuck together on the hoof. It was never devised. It simply
congealed.
What’s customary
is to peer through this cloud of particles and see what furniture was
there from the beginning (Earthly companions yes, Tardis, yes, Time
Lords not, etc). But we’re not doing that here. Instead we’re
letting ourselves be drawn to what strikes the modern viewer as
iconic. After all, while fans might latch onto
plot-points or particulars, a general audience is likely to respond
more imagistically. And anyway, if we’re talking about the
evolution of the show, we all know its fundamental to Darwinism that
each evolutionary step has to have an immediate
reason for occurring – not just a long-term goal.
The great toy
spin-offs the Tardis and the Daleks are there from the beginning, of
course. Though the pepperpots perfectly exemplify the themes in Terry Nation’s script, and though they’re certainly iconic in the sense
of enduring… I can’t consider them part of
what I’m on about here. Steven Moffatt was right to call them “a
bit of ridiculous Sixties pop art.” (‘Radio Times’,
20-26/3/10) They look iconic of
the Sixties, endearingly
archaic, like Mini cars or Beatle haircuts.
Perhaps they’ve
since suffered the death of a thousand skits, or perhaps their very
crossover appeal lies in the facts that they never did look
that
scary, lending themselves easily to teatime viewing and marketing
campaigns. ’The Guardian’s list of Alternative
Design Classics (14/1/09) puts the Daleks at number three –
“somehow they have become as loveable as they are monstrous.” And
I couldn’t have put it better myself.
Even the re-launch
implicitly acknowledged this, announcing the Daleks’ return with a
’Radio Times’ cover but starting with a caged,
broken Dalek - something only the Doctor knows to be scared of. Okay
these things may not look
like much, the post-CGI generation was being told, but wait to see
what they can do.
What’s iconic in
the sense of being both classic and
immediate, in the sense that it can still grab you even today, is the
credit sequence. Grainer and Derbyshire’s theme tune of course
chimes with genius, and sounds just as otherworldly today despite its
familiarity. But I’m talking here of the total
credit sequence, as a gestalt integration of sound and
vision.
It’s hard to
recount the effect this sequence would have upon me as a young
feller. ’Stingray’ opened with the classic
line “anything can happen in the next half hour”, words to set
infant hearts a-racing. But ’Doctor Who’ upped
the ante by demonstrating
anything could happen, in what felt like a total disruption of the
normal rules of time, space and Seventies TV.
The psychedelic
tunnel was a vital emblem of this to me, a portal between worlds,
like the typhoon that took Dorothy to Oz. It opened up a hole in
consensus reality right in the middle of our suburban living room -
and pushed me through it. Half an hour later, it would reappear to
take you back again and Bruce Forsyth would come on to announce
’The Generation Game’.
Part of its appeal
was that it seemed unlike even other science fiction shows, and the
credit sequence telegraphed that. They almost always started with star
fields and quasi-military music. For maximum contrast compare
’Doctor Who’ with the other ‘classic’ SF
TV show, ’Star Trek’, which appeared a mere
three years later. It was ’Trek’ which more
commonly set the template, and (though my juvenile brain would have
been unable to articulate it at the time) create the distinction
between two types of SF show.
Post ’Star
Trek’ shows would be military stories with teleporting
instead of parachuting, or Western stories with ray guns for pistols,
the stuff ’Pigs in Space’ took the piss out
of. (The original brief for ’Star Trek’ was
“Wagon Train in space”.) The rarer post-’Who’
shows were uncanny and otherworldly. They weren’t even necessarily
science fiction shows, they overlapped with horror
but mostly they were strange. (Though in my
youthful innocence I then thought ’Who’
unique, it bears some familial resemblance to ’The Outer
Limits’ or ’The Twilight Zone’.)
One could be
exciting, but with the other you weren’t even
sure how to respond. In my juvenile pedantry I
even came to dislike scenes which showed the Tardis floating among
stars like some common-or-garden silver rocket. The Tardis, I firmly
held, should dematerialise from the world as we knew it and then
reappear to us only when it chose to materialise again.
(Instinctively recognising, years before I actually knew, that this
mirrored the astral flight of the shaman.)
Watching the
various credit sequences through, what‘s striking is how their
development (and otherwise) can be used as a rough and ready
barometer of the quality of the series as a whole. First we have not
the psychedelic tunnel of my youth but a kind of ripple effect,
conveying distortion in the fabric of space and time. (Quite
awesomely, done through a feedback loop, like Hendrix’s guitar only
done visually.)
This gets refined
in the Troughton era, and the Doctors’ face added. (The documentary
bundled with the ’In The Beginning’ DVD claims
this has been originally pitched but nixed by producer Verity Lambert
as too frightening!) It reaches both psychedelic-tunnelhood and a
sustained peak through the Pertwee and early Baker years. (Though the
ideal
sequence, the one of my dreams, would be the tunnel combined with the
pre-diamond slab serif logo.)
Then it all goes
wrong in that great historical cusp year of 1980, inventively
substituting (wait for it!) a star field! Tom Baker was still at the
helm, but the series was already in decline. The Sylvester McCoy logo
is a classic example of how a ’63 look can be classic but an ’87
one merely dated. The modern relaunch comes with more updates, but
the closest referring back to both title sequence and original theme
tune in over thirty years.
Okay, it's not a
precise fit. The McCoy era was more characterised by good ideas which
worked only fitfully, while that logo is simply baaaaad.
And while the relaunched show has hit two peaks, when Davies first
kicked it off and when Moffat first replaced him, then sagged
between, it's credit sequence has slowly but consistently drifted
away from the original. But it's a surprisingly good barometer.
Examples:The
vidclip below allows you to see the
sequences as a segue. If you want to see each sequence separately, as
broadcast and with descriptions, use this
link.
Totally agree about the quality of the credit sequences reflecting the series' general quality. And I love that "like Hendrix’s guitar only done visually"!
ReplyDeleteDoesn't really work as a parallel though, does it? I mean the programme has gone up and down in quality, with a really big trough through the Saward era, whereas the title sequence did variations on brilliantly abstract, followed by variations on boring starfields. And the revival has had an ok title sequence, but never really brilliant (although the most recent one is best, for my money).
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments!
ReplyDeleteWhittso, by parallel you mean barometer? I think how well it works depends on how big a scale you look at it from, the further back you stand the better. What's most striking to me is the star field appearing in later Baker, just when the best Doctor was at his worst. It's certainly not a precise fit, as I acknowledged in the piece.
I'd argue the revival credit sequence was never as good as the original. Though perhaps for a different reason to steady degeneration. Adding elements, such as backstories for the companion, sometimes did and sometimes didn't work. Regardless, it ws probably something the revival needed to do to prevent it just being a re-enactment. But the original sequence had an elegant simplicity where you can't add without detracting. Adding the strings to the theme just sums it up. It's like taking the Acropolis and building an extension.
And to my eyes it degenerated from there pretty evenly. The current sequence, with the clouds and the lightning bolts… my money wouldn't be on that at all.