Tate
Modern, to 28th October
I
like the idea of installation art. In fact I tend to like it a good
deal more than the reality. In the idea, you immerse yourself in an
entire environment. Rather than standing before a framed picture
hoping it has some effect upon you, you're already there
– inside the flows of the artist's imagination, like some
'Fantastic Voyage' trip.
But
all too often the reality feels gimmicky and unfocused, a grab-bag of
pieces which don't really fit together or show any signs of having
been thought through. It's like a collection of phrases masquerading
as a novel.
Take
for example 'The
Tanks', the programme of “art in action” in the new
wing of the Tate Modern. Things can be inventively eye-catching in
the way that adverts can. You can wander through them quite happily.
Just don't stand and look or, whatever you do, stop to consider any
of this. That would be like paying attention to the little man behind
the curtain.
What the works are most like is the space they're in - just not as good. For this new wing, with it's industrial-megalith look, is both assault on and tonic for the senses. It's the standard thing with contemporary galleries. The building is more stimulating than the works it's supposed to house.
What the works are most like is the space they're in - just not as good. For this new wing, with it's industrial-megalith look, is both assault on and tonic for the senses. It's the standard thing with contemporary galleries. The building is more stimulating than the works it's supposed to house.
Then,
just when I was writing the whole thing off as a non-event, I tried
out the final room. The room that feels such an after-thought you
even have to walk through another piece to get to it. And encountered
Lis Rhodes' 'Light Music'.
Where
everything else was a non-sum of its parts, this was elegant in it's
simplicity. Two light projectors at the ends of the room point at
screens behind each other. The black-and-white abstract images they
project actually become the score, read by the
projector as a kind of notation which produces electronic sounds. You
see exactly what you hear. And you see everything - unlike the
projection box at the cinema, the projectors sit in open sight. Even
the beams of light, which we normally think of as a kind of pipe,
tramsitting information which only gets decoded once it hits the
screen, become objects in themselves. The images are often so simple you can see them replicated in light.
As
the projectors simply sit on the floor, it's pretty much impossible
to check out the work without crossing the projected beam. Though the other pieces in the Tanks used projections, whenever someone wandered
in front of one it felt intrusive – like someone jumping up in the
cinema. Here it felt very much part of the process. I stood and watched
the new arrivals. Some hugged the edges, only tentatively stepping
forward. Others plunged straight onto the dancefloor, interacting
with the projections. It worked like a kind of discotheque for
modernists. Rhodes has commented she wanted to see “the audience
engage with the film, rather than being outside of it.”
Remember
the sales line for the game 'Othello' - “a
minute to learn, a lifetime to master”? This piece works something
like that. You can see each of the few elements straight away. But
add them together, find an audience and the combinations then become
limitless. The more you stay, the more you become aware of the
changes and shifts, of the different effects different attendees
bring with them. “The concept of cinema has always
tended to straighten things out”, Rhodes has said. “'Light
Music' does not meet this prescription. It is more
or less different every time it is screened.”
In
all honesty, I'd never even heard of Rhodes before. Apparantly she's
been at it since the Sixties, with this piece dating from 1975 and is
still up to stuff today. Here she is, describing her work and
berating the lack of women composers...
No comments:
Post a Comment